Lisbon Regional School (Middle)
24 Highland Ave Lisbon NH, 03585, Grafton County Phone: 603-838-5506 Ranking: (180 out of 355, bottom 49%)* Type: Regular Middle School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 8 School District: Lisbon Regional School District Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | |||||||
Total Students: | 91 | 96 | 101 | 102 | 100 | 102 | 107 | |||||||
Grade 6: | 27 | 29.7% | 29 | 30.2% | 28 | 27.7% | 27 | 26.5% | 37 | 37.0% | 31 | 30.4% | 32 | 29.9% |
Grade 7: | 33 | 36.3% | 34 | 35.4% | 35 | 34.7% | 37 | 36.3% | 33 | 33.0% | 35 | 34.3% | 31 | 29.0% |
Grade 8: | 31 | 34.1% | 33 | 34.4% | 38 | 37.6% | 38 | 37.3% | 30 | 30.0% | 36 | 35.3% | 44 | 41.1% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 42 | 46.2% | 38 | 39.6% | 42 | 41.6% | 41 | 40.2% | 45 | 45.0% | 49 | 48.0% | 63 | 58.9% |
Female: | 49 | 53.8% | 58 | 60.4% | 59 | 58.4% | 61 | 59.8% | 55 | 55.0% | 45 | 44.1% | 40 | 37.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.0% | 1 | 1.0% | 1 | 1.0% | 2 | 2.0% | 1 | 0.9% |
Asian: | 2 | 2.2% | 2 | 2.1% | 3 | 3.0% | 1 | 1.0% | 1 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Hispanic: | 1 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Black: | 1 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
White: | 87 | 95.6% | 94 | 97.9% | 97 | 96.0% | 100 | 98.0% | 98 | 98.0% | 100 | 98.0% | 106 | 99.1% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 29 | 31.9% | 38 | 39.6% | 33 | 32.7% | 24 | 23.5% | 29 | 29.0% | 25 | 24.5% | 22 | 20.6% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 11 | 12.1% | 8 | 8.3% | 8 | 7.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 14 | 14.0% | 15 | 14.7% | 12 | 11.2% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 10.46 | 10.00 | 11.22 | 10.00 | 10.53 | 13.20 | 10.50 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
NECAP | ||||||
2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 56% | 56% | 61% |
2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 54% | 54% | 67% |
2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 56% | 56% | 68% |
2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 67% | 67% | 69% |
2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 72% |
2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 71% |
2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 56% | 56% | 72% |
2013 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 74% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 50% | 50% | 65% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | 72% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 62% | 62% | 73% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | 74% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 76% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 77% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 89% | 89% | 80% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93% | 79% |
2006 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 43% | 43% | 59% |
2007 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 50% | 50% | 62% |
2008 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 61% | 61% | 63% |
2009 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71% | 66% |
2010 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 65% | 65% | 66% |
2011 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | 66% |
2012 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | 68% |
2013 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 69% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 46% | 46% | 66% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 56% | 56% | 67% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 58% | 58% | 75% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 69% | 69% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 77% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 72% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% | 77% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 77% |
2006 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 42% | 42% | 56% |
2007 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 44% | 41% | 57% |
2008 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 34% | 34% | 58% |
2009 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 67% | 67% | 65% |
2010 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | 66% |
2011 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 65% | 64% | 66% |
2012 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 68% |
2013 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | 68% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 50% | 62% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 60% | 58% | 66% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 41% | 41% | 67% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 64% | 64% | 71% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 76% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87% | 84% | 78% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 98% | 98% | 82% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | 82% |
2006 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 37% | 37% | 49% |
2007 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 36% | 35% | 42% |
2008 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 18% | 18% | 43% |
2009 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 45% | 45% | 51% |
2011 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 79% | 77% | 64% |
2012 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 74% | 74% | 61% |
2013 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | 67% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Lisbon Regional School (Middle) was rated 3 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.