Thurgood Marshall Mid Middle School
19 Porter St
Lynn MA, 01902, Essex County
Phone: 781-477-7360
Ranking: (1,274 out of 1,316, bottom 3%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 8
School District: Lynn School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 72 | 71 | 65 | 63 | 68 | 67 | 76 | |||||||
Total Students: | 957 | 973 | 947 | 930 | 884 | 767 | 795 | |||||||
Grade 6: | 311 | 32.5% | 320 | 32.9% | 303 | 32.0% | 318 | 34.2% | 307 | 34.7% | 243 | 31.7% | 247 | 31.1% |
Grade 7: | 330 | 34.5% | 314 | 32.3% | 335 | 35.4% | 327 | 35.2% | 290 | 32.8% | 244 | 31.8% | 279 | 35.1% |
Grade 8: | 316 | 33.0% | 339 | 34.8% | 309 | 32.6% | 285 | 30.6% | 287 | 32.5% | 280 | 36.5% | 269 | 33.8% |
Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 525 | 54.9% | 517 | 53.1% | 492 | 52.0% | 480 | 51.6% | 448 | 50.7% | 406 | 52.9% | 406 | 51.1% |
Female: | 432 | 45.1% | 456 | 46.9% | 455 | 48.0% | 450 | 48.4% | 436 | 49.3% | 361 | 47.1% | 369 | 46.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.1% |
Asian: | 65 | 6.8% | 65 | 6.7% | 74 | 7.8% | 75 | 8.1% | 86 | 9.7% | 91 | 11.9% | 86 | 10.8% |
Hispanic: | 617 | 64.5% | 619 | 63.6% | 577 | 60.9% | 553 | 59.5% | 507 | 57.4% | 427 | 55.7% | 436 | 54.8% |
Black: | 119 | 12.4% | 128 | 13.2% | 129 | 13.6% | 132 | 14.2% | 128 | 14.5% | 116 | 15.1% | 127 | 16.0% |
White: | 121 | 12.6% | 127 | 13.1% | 133 | 14.0% | 142 | 15.3% | 138 | 15.6% | 115 | 15.0% | 129 | 16.2% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 34 | 3.6% | 32 | 3.3% | 33 | 3.5% | 26 | 2.8% | 24 | 2.7% | 16 | 2.1% | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 832 | 86.9% | 845 | 86.8% | 837 | 88.4% | 808 | 86.9% | 757 | 85.6% | 626 | 81.6% | 628 | 79.0% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 73 | 7.6% | 65 | 6.7% | 57 | 6.0% | 60 | 6.5% | 64 | 7.2% | 69 | 9.0% | 80 | 10.1% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 13.38 | 13.78 | 14.47 | 14.73 | 13.07 | 11.40 | 10.50 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MCAS | ||||||
2006 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 42% | 50% | 64% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 36% | 48% | 67% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 52% | 53% | 67% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 38% | 47% | 66% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 40% | 45% | 69% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 32% | 42% | 68% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 36% | 39% | 66% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 44% | 44% | 67% |
2003 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 17.3% | 27.1% | 42% |
2004 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 18% | 28% | 42% |
2005 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 18% | 30% | 46% |
2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 17% | 31% | 46% |
2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 26% | 35% | 52% |
2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 37% | 44% | 56% |
2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 22% | 38% | 57% |
2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 26% | 36% | 59% |
2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 23% | 35% | 58% |
2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 27% | 39% | 60% |
2013 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 24% | 35% | 60% |
2003 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 42.7% | 52.3% | 66% |
2004 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 40% | 51% | 68% |
2005 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 36% | 47% | 66% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 41% | 46% | 65% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 31% | 49% | 69% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 32% | 46% | 69% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 39% | 47% | 70% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 47% | 49% | 72% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 50% | 51% | 73% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 44% | 50% | 71% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 46% | 48% | 71% |
2006 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 15% | 20% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 16% | 28% | 46% |
2008 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 15% | 25% | 47% |
2009 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 25% | 25% | 49% |
2010 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 19% | 30% | 53% |
2011 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 20% | 29% | 51% |
2012 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 11% | 21% | 51% |
2013 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 14% | 20% | 52% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 40% | 52% | 74% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 38% | 55% | 75% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 45% | 60% | 75% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 51% | 61% | 78% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 59% | 61% | 78% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 59% | 63% | 79% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 52% | 59% | 81% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 47% | 57% | 78% |
2003 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 13.4% | 16.5% | 37% |
2004 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 12% | 23% | 39% |
2005 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 6% | 20% | 39% |
2006 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 10% | 22% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 10% | 23% | 45% |
2008 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 14% | 29% | 49% |
2009 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 19% | 28% | 48% |
2010 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 27% | 30% | 51% |
2011 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 18% | 30% | 52% |
2012 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 15% | 28% | 52% |
2013 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 16% | 30% | 54% |
2003 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 7.9% | 12.9% | 32% |
2004 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 6% | 18% | 33% |
2005 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 5% | 14% | 33% |
2006 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 1% | 7% | 32% |
2007 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 5% | 10% | 33% |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 3% | 11% | 39% |
2009 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 8% | 17% | 39% |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 13% | 15% | 40% |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 10% | 18% | 39% |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 7% | 17% | 43% |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 4% | 16% | 39% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Thurgood Marshall Mid Middle School was rated 1 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.