Rosendale-Brandon School District
Rosendale-Brandon School District is located in southeast Wisconsin. Rosendale-Brandon School District has 131.10 square miles of land area and 1.20 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Rosendale-Brandon School District population is 5,591. Rosendale-Brandon School District median household income is $65,179 in 2010-2014. Rosendale-Brandon School District median house value is $163,100 in 2010-2014. On average, Rosendale-Brandon School District is much better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Rosendale-Brandon School District Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
300 West Wisconsin St
Rosendale WI, 54974, Fond Du Lac County
Phone: 920-872-2851
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 1,055 | 1,052 | 1,034 | 1,013 | 1,037 | 1,035 | 1,049 |
English Language Learner Students: | 7 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
Total Teachers: | 68.59 | 67.06 | 63.99 | 70.63 | 71.45 | 71.60 | 71.60 |
Prekindergarten: | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.04 | 2.04 | 2.50 | 3.00 |
Kindergarten: | 4.02 | 4.00 | 3.15 | 3.00 | 3.02 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
Elementary: | 26.94 | 26.55 | 26.92 | 28.48 | 28.45 | 26.90 | 27.70 |
Secondary: | 35.11 | 33.99 | 31.42 | 37.11 | 37.94 | 38.20 | 36.90 |
Ungraded: | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Other Staff: | 57.88 | 59.01 | 60.20 | 61.39 | 59.80 | 58.90 | 59.90 |
Instructional Aides: | 17.50 | 15.68 | 15.44 | 16.06 | 14.81 | 13.70 | 13.90 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 1.40 | 0.60 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 1.82 | 2.09 | 1.96 | 2.10 | 1.98 | 2.10 | 2.10 |
District Administrators: | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
District Administrative Support: | 3.02 | 3.11 | 3.11 | 3.11 | 3.11 | 2.70 | 3.30 |
School Administrators: | 2.76 | 2.72 | 2.76 | 2.76 | 2.76 | 2.80 | 2.80 |
School Administrative Support: | 5.04 | 5.94 | 5.85 | 5.96 | 5.78 | 5.30 | 5.60 |
Student Support Services: | 4.44 | 5.60 | 5.57 | 5.53 | 5.67 | 5.70 | 5.70 |
Other Support Services: | 15.78 | 16.26 | 17.79 | 18.15 | 17.97 | 17.60 | 18.30 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 15.38 | 15.69 | 16.16 | 14.34 | 14.51 | 14.46 | 14.65 |
Schools
Brandon Elementary | Prekindergarten to Grade 5 | 200 West Bowen, Brandon WI 53919 | |
Brandon Middle | Grade 6 to Grade 8 | 200 West Bowen, Brandon WI 53919 | |
Cirrus Charter High | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 301 West Division St, Rosendale WI 54974 | |
Laconia High | Grade 9 to Grade 12 | 301 West Division St, Rosendale WI 54974 | |
Rosendale Intermediate | Grade 4 to Grade 8 | 200 South Main St, Rosendale WI 54974 | |
Rosendale Primary | Prekindergarten to Grade 3 | 300 West Wisconsin St, Rosendale WI 54974 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
WKCE Test | |||||
2006 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 70% |
2008 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 73% |
2009 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 73% |
2010 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 71% |
2011 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 74% |
2012 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 73% |
2013 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 76% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 70% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 72% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 82% | 72% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 73% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77% | 74% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 82% | 74% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 47% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 74% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 76% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 78% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 77% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 80% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 58% | 40% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 70% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 75% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 94% | 74% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 76% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 75% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 78% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 94% | 74% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 79% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 95% | 78% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 77% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 82% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 78% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 89% | 82% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82% | 75% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82% | 78% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83% | 77% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86% | 75% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84% | 78% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 65% | 50% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92% | 79% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89% | 81% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78% | 80% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85% | 81% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 45% | 35% |
2008 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 76% | 77% |
2009 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 78% |
2010 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 76% | 78% |
2011 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 77% |
2012 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 78% |
2013 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 79% | 77% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 86% | 78% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 82% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 81% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 82% | 81% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 50% | 50% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 82% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 95% | 83% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 89% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88% | 84% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 83% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 32% | 33% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 77% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 82% | 77% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 79% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 85% | 79% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 76% | 79% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 79% |
2008 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 94% | 92% |
2009 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 97% | 92% |
2010 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 91% | 93% |
2011 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 97% | 92% |
2012 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 96% | 93% |
2013 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 91% | 92% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 79% | 71% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 96% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 90% | 79% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94% | 79% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 63% | 52% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87% | 82% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 94% | 85% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 84% | 82% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 88% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 84% | 85% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 33% | 36% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 88% | 75% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 89% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 95% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84% | 79% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 94% | 81% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 83% | 79% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 79% | 54% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90% | 84% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95% | 86% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 83% | 84% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86% | 84% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 97% | 87% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 87% | 84% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 44% | 35% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 84% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88% | 80% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 94% | 82% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 96% | 82% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 55% | 49% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 84% | 86% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 96% | 87% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 93% | 87% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 94% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 47% | 38% |
2008 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 71% | 64% |
2009 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 67% | 65% |
2010 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 70% | 66% |
2011 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 70% | 63% |
2012 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 72% | 66% |
2013 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 61% | 61% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 78% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 81% | 80% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 86% | 80% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 94% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 59% | 46% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 86% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83% | 86% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 91% | 85% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 88% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 94% | 85% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 45% | 42% |
2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 86% | 76% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 87% | 82% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 86% | 79% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 96% | 82% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 87% | 79% |
2008 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 90% | 83% |
2009 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 83% |
2010 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 82% |
2011 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 83% |
2012 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 86% | 82% |
2013 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 83% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $12,025,000 | $11,630 | $13,408,000 | $13,236 | $13,422,000 | $12,943 | |||
Federal: | $444,000 | $429 | 3.7% | $384,000 | $379 | 2.9% | $828,000 | $798 | 6.2% |
State: | $7,050,000 | $6,818 | 58.6% | $7,820,000 | $7,720 | 58.3% | $7,607,000 | $7,336 | 56.7% |
Local: | $4,531,000 | $4,382 | 37.7% | $5,204,000 | $5,137 | 38.8% | $4,987,000 | $4,809 | 37.2% |
Total Expenditures: | $10,930,000 | $10,571 | $12,532,000 | $12,371 | $12,421,000 | $11,978 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $9,845,000 | $9,521 | $11,385,000 | $11,239 | $10,917,000 | $10,527 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $5,280,000 | $5,106 | 53.6% | $6,557,000 | $6,473 | 57.6% | $6,489,000 | $6,257 | 59.4% |
Student and Staff Support: | $913,000 | $883 | 9.3% | $1,103,000 | $1,089 | 9.7% | $966,000 | $932 | 8.8% |
Administration: | $1,727,000 | $1,670 | 17.5% | $1,711,000 | $1,689 | 15.0% | $1,569,000 | $1,513 | 14.4% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $1,925,000 | $1,862 | 19.6% | $2,014,000 | $1,988 | 17.7% | $1,893,000 | $1,825 | 17.3% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $506,000 | $489 | $419,000 | $414 | $582,000 | $561 | |||
Construction: | $256,000 | $248 | $155,000 | $153 | $355,000 | $342 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $132,000 | $128 | $258,000 | $255 | $296,000 | $285 | |||
Total Salary: | $5,310,000 | $5,135 | $5,996,000 | $5,919 | $5,916,000 | $5,705 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $3,642,000 | $3,522 | 68.6% | $4,281,000 | $4,226 | 71.4% | $4,266,000 | $4,114 | 72.1% |
Other Salary: | $1,668,000 | $1,613 | 31.4% | $1,715,000 | $1,693 | 28.6% | $1,650,000 | $1,591 | 27.9% |
Total Benefit: | $2,469,000 | $2,388 | $3,108,000 | $3,068 | $3,033,000 | $2,925 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $1,407,000 | $1,361 | 57.0% | $2,042,000 | $2,016 | 65.7% | $1,981,000 | $1,910 | 65.3% |
Other Benefit: | $1,062,000 | $1,027 | 43.0% | $1,066,000 | $1,052 | 34.3% | $1,052,000 | $1,014 | 34.7% |
* Rosendale-Brandon School District was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.